"If you work harder, you will get luckier" per Anita Sarawak dictum.

i really feel shame on you. since you are so well and highly educated, it is really fall beyond my expectation that you were actually dictated this saying. do you fully aware what are the provisions stipulated in our constitutions?
let me enlighten you if you were to be so lack of knowledge in this area.

Article 8. Equality

(1) All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.

(2) Except as expressly authorized by this Constitution, there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent or place of birth or gender in any law or in the appointment to any office or employment under a public authority or in the administration of any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment.

(3) There shall be no discrimination in favour of any person on the ground that he is a subject of the Ruler of any State.

(4) No public authority shall discriminate against any person on the ground that he is resident or carrying on business in any part of the Federation outside the jurisdiction of the authority.

(5) This Article does not invalidate or prohibit -

(a)	any provision regulating personal law;
(b)	any provision or practice restricting office or employment connected with the affairs of any religion, or of an institution managed by a group professing any religion, to persons professing that religion;
(c)	any provision for the protection, well-being or advancement of the aboriginal peoples of the Malay Peninsula (including the reservation of land) or the reservation to aborigines of a reasonable proportion of suitable positions in the public service;
(d)	any provision prescribing residence in a State or part of a State as a qualification for election or appointment to any authority having jurisdiction only in that State or part, or for voting in such an election;
(e)	any provision of a Constitution of a State, being or corresponding to a provision in force immediately before Merdeka Day;
(f)	any provision restricting enlistment in the Malay Regiment to Malays.

Article 11. Freedom of religion.

(1) Every person has the right to profess and practice his religion and, subject to Clause (4), to propagate it.

(2) No person shall be compelled to pay any tax the proceeds of which are specially allocated in whole or in part for the purposes of a religion other than his own.

(3) Every religious group has the right -

(a)	to manage its own religious affairs;
(b)	to establish and maintain institutions for religious or charitable purposes; and
(c)	to acquire and own property and hold and administer it in accordance with law.

(4) State law and in respect of the Federal Territories of Kuala Lumpur, Labuan and Putrajaya, federal law may control or restrict the propagation of any religious doctrine or belief among persons professing the religion of Islam.

(5) This Article does not authorize any act contrary to any general law relating to public order, public health or morality.

Article 12. Rights in respect of education.

(1) Without prejudice to the generality of Article 8, there shall be no discrimination against any citizen on the grounds only of religion, race, descent or place of birth-

(a)	in the administration of any educational institution maintained by a public authority, and, in particular, the admission of pupils or students or the payment of fees; or
(b)	in providing out of the funds of a public authority financial aid for the maintenance or education of pupils or students in any educational institution (whether or not maintained by a public authority and whether within or outside the Federation).

(2) Every religious group has the right to establish and maintain institutions for the education of children in its own religion, and there shall be no discrimination on the ground only of religion in any law relating to such institutions or in the administration of any such law; but it shall be lawful for the Federation or a State to establish or maintain or assist in establishing or maintaining Islamic institutions or provide or assist in providing instruction in the religion of Islam and incur such expenditure as may be necessary for the purpose.

(3) No person shall be required to receive instruction in or take part in any ceremony or act of worship of a religion other than his own.

(4) For the purposes of Clause (3) the religion of a person under the age of eighteen years shall be decided by his parent or guardian.

my dear professor, can you just open your tiny blurry defective eyes and have a GOOD look of every single words as stated in the constitution? every creature in rarum natura is protected in queen's peace and vested protected in constitution coat. we enjoy all the freedom as stated clearly in the constitution, so long as we do not bring or do anything to provoke the public order and peace.no rights can be infringed by any mean or reason.

freedom to learn the mother-tongue is CLEARLY stated and stipulated in Art 12(1). usurpation is totally against this. we have our every rights to learn and study our own language. i admit we do and have the freedom to express our view, but when the view is about to cause tension, then the expectation from a reasonable man is make consideration and weigh the gravity of the view before make it public. blend everything into one and make a mold to produce all the same product, will it really cure the root problem once and for all? think out of box, this is the common phrase that we hear all the time, the question is, if you never know what is the box, then how can you think out of the box? what box?

everyone is deserve to enjoy equality as Art 8 enacted. asking your own people to give up the mother-tongue language will really solve the problems that we encounter today? what is the fact and evident that you can show that that is the root problem? are you trying to tell the world at large that if you were to study in Chinese school then you are assume to be proficient in mandarin and likewise? what make you assume that if we were from different schooling system then we will not be well verse in other language? what kind of logic is that? if you were Chinese then should i assume that you must know to use chopsticks, speak all the dialects, know all the customs, calligraphy, and everything? if your theory were correct, then i wonder how China can communicate with the outside world? how they so successfully ran the Olympic? since they also adopt one schooling system.

we have all the technology today, and today, children have better exposure as compare to some old dinosaurs and close-minded, even they are from ivory tower. unless and until you cast away and isolate yourself from society, there is no one can actually never talk to others from different ethnics. even if you belongs to minority group, is that suppose to mean that you have to surrender your rights and let the majority decide to you? i strongly feel that my dear professor should go and study State and U.K. or Australia constitution. There are some provision to protect the minorities constitutional rights. They are so advance ahead of us and they, legislatures legislate the legislation to protect the minorities, but you as a professor is suggesting that the minorities should give up the rights to the majority? what is happening to your mental faculty of reasoning, understanding and memory?

ethnic identity will be buried in history if there is only one that come to exist. the extinction of others never ensure that the singlet will achieve any glory or prosperity. mixture never guaranty better.

i will be happy if you were to adduce any statistics or data or proof of facts to convince me, or else, just keep your mouth shut and let's your ass rules over your brain if you have one.