"If you work harder, you will get luckier" per Anita Sarawak dictum.

why is it so hard to lend your ears to others?

just because it is after office hours then you have no care for them? merely due to you are not being pay for extra hours? or simply because you have more importance issue to cover e.g. reveal others privacy life and make it public, as to show to others that how much you know about that particular target as compare to others. is it bring satisfaction to you? to feed your hunger of maliceaforethought? Do you realize that the victim can actually sue you under Defamation Act 1957 Article (7) and (9) and (306)?

our duty suppose to be consultant and not public amplifier. assuming as you were to occupy so much free time to waste, why not offer yourself to be a volunteer for charity or take up a course to upgrade yourself? knowledge for me is the only tool to let others have high regard for you and listen to you. gossiping on others makes no one respect to you. no one will treasure a friend as backstabber and traitor.

in fact, such action as digging your own grave. i used to say you pay peanut and you get monkey, or i learn from someone that you reap what you sow. i think it is true. never think that no one will come to knowledge that what you had done at their back. i don't deny that everything is a curate's egg, but from this saying, i see no good. i try to weigh the gravity on the issue and the rationale behind such action, maybe i am not up to par, i failed to apprehend the logic and rationale.

life is so short and yet so long. you can either live as a man or an ape. live with pride or bribe. i might not be as blue-blooded as you, as bright as you, but that doesn't mean i deserve no respect and rights. you are infringing my rights, my dignity and my pride. the issue of my private life should never ever becoming an issue at all. i have my freedom, as stated clearly as enacted in constitution, (kindly refer my previous blog). inter alia, i am not doing anything wrong or against the laws and orders.

mutual respect is bona fide for all the human race, for the sake of peace and harmonious. it is sine qua non. disrespect is a mala fide to all the parties, it is never a win-win situation. i am so dishearten for such action and saying. as a mature adult, can't you weigh the balance and gravity of the consequence follow by your action? McNaughtem made it clear the definition of "disease of mind" and Quick & Paddison made it clear about external and internal factors that defect the mental faculty of reasoning, memory and understanding, which case is applying on you then?