"If you work harder, you will get luckier" per Anita Sarawak dictum.

according to my lovely gorgeous colleague, i am not consider as "shy". am i? as i described myself before, innerly i am a very "shy, timid, pacify" person. i am just pretending to be "outgoing" person as to keep myself survive in the society. don't judge a book from it's cover. you will never figure out the true personality by knowing the person in just a few decades. we need our eternal life to get to know people. man, human is complicated, the gut's feeling, emotion, knowledge, consciences, and everything, they are chemistry. the reaction is out knowing. everyone is so unique.

so why want to judge me just because you "assume" you know me? i am a dog in human's clothing. and why jump to conclusion in a speed of light? i am too shy to open up myself to everyone. to "divulge" me, you need to wait a donkey time. general presumption can always be rebutted, so long as there is new facts emerge. the conclusion that you make during the first sigh, will it be a bona fide or mala fide is yet another scenario to be proven in coming material time. the modus operandi always the same, we adjudicate the people at first sight. again, before you further to scrutinize the details, the mind set will hardly be modified.

so, before you tag the label of "shy?" on me, it is not fair to judge me base on your own facts. the prima facie case never establish. according Article 6 HRA 1988, even you keen on to raise a case, i earns the right to a fair trial. i have Socrates's spirit with me, i will never run away from fair and just trial. the burden to prove beyond reasonable doubt will be the prosecutor (Woolmington V DPP) or defendant? since this is not an insanity nor specific intent case, you can't discharge the burden upon me.